SUBSTITUTION AS A MEANS OF COHESION IN A DRAMATIC TEXT
Volodina Marina Sergeevna
Don State Technical University
Abstract. Within the framework of the article research attention is focused on substitution as a frequency means of grammatical cohesion of a dramatic text. The paper emphasizes the problem of the types of substitution that are observed in dialogues of dramatic texts, their role in ensuring the cohesion of such texts. The drama "Pygmalion" by B. Shaw is chosen as the factual material of the study. The dialogues of the drama characters, according to the author’s observations, are characterized by semantic transparency and syntactic simplicity, and therefore the researcher (and the reader) has the opportunity to identify easily substitution models and their text-forming functions.
Key words and phrases: драматический текст, диалог персонажей, когезия, грамматические средства связности, субституция, dramatic text, dialogue of characters, cohesion, grammatical means of cohesion, substitution
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Azarova O. A., Kudryashov I. A. Kognitivnyi podkhod k issledovaniyu neyavnogo znaniya // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2015. № 21. S. 30-33.
Gavrilova G. F. Predlozhenie i tekst: sistemnost' i funktsional'nost'. Rostov-na-Donu: AkademLit, 2015. 412 s.
Klemenova E. N., Kudryashov I. A. Germenevticheskii analiz teksta: kognitivnye osnovaniya // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanii. 2013. № 7. S. 109-113.
Klemenova E. N., Kudryashov I. A. Dialogicheskoe dvizhenie v sovremennoi lingvistike: pragmaticheskoe issledovanie lichnosti v informatsionnom obshchestve // Sotsiokul'turnye sredy i kommunikativnye strategii informatsionnogo obshchestva: trudy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-teoreticheskoi konferentsii. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskii politekhnicheskii universitet Petra Velikogo, 2015. S. 281-289.
Sknar G. D. Tematicheskie komponenty kak sredstvo svyaznosti v spontannoi dialogicheskoi kommunikatsii // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Severo-Kavkazskii region. Seriya: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2013. № 1 (173). S. 96-100.
Sknar G. D., Kudryashov I. A. Pragmaticheskie modeli diskursivnoi anafory v monologicheskom tekste // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Russkii i inostrannye yazyki i metodika ikh prepodavaniya. 2017. T. 15. № 1. S. 51-65.
Halliday M. A. K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. L.: Longman, 1976. 347 p.
Mann W. C., Thompson S. A. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization // Text. 1988. № 8 (3). P. 243-281.
Shaw B. Pygmalion. L.: Penguin Books, 2014. 121 p.
Van Dijk T. A. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Functional Coherence in Discourse // Journal of Pragmatics. 1980. № 4. P. 233-253.
Русский
