GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 3. Part 1. P. 117-120.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

THE NOTION OF DISCREPANCIES KNOT LENGTH IN MANUSCRIPTS CLASSIFICATION

Mironova Dina Markovna
Saint Petersburg University


Abstract. The article formulates the principles of discrepancies knots formation in preparing material for the classification of manuscripts. The author summarizes the rules of singling out discrepancies knots previously proposed by textual critics and applies them to the text of the Church Slavonic translation of the Gospel of Matthew of the XI-XVI centuries. The applicability of the rules is substantiated by the method of Alekseev cluster analysis. This study allows formulating a definition of discrepancies knot length as a minimum element of the text, the change of which is not followed by the change in other elements.
Key words and phrases: длина узла разночтений, классификация рукописей, кластеризация, коэффициент близости, матрица процентов сходства, метод кластерного анализа Алексеева, узел разночтений, discrepancies knot length, classification of manuscripts, clustering, closeness value, percent similarity matrix, cluster analysis method by Alekseev, discrepancies knot
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Alekseev A. A. Tekstologiya slavyanskoi Biblii. SPb.: Dmitrii Bulanin, 1999. 256 s.
  2. Alekseev A. A., Kuznetsova E. L. EVM i problemy tekstologii drevneslavyanskikh tekstov // Lingvisticheskie zadachi i obrabotka dannykh na EVM. M., 1987. S. 111-121.
  3. Pichkhadze A. A. Primenenie statistiki pri tekstologicheskom issledovanii pamyatnika s kontroliruemoi traditsiei (Drevneslavyanskii Parimeinik) // Lingvisticheskie zadachi i obrabotka dannykh na EVM. M.: IRYa AN SSSR, 1987. S. 121-140.
  4. Colwell E. C. Studies in Textual Criticism of the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 1969. 319 p.
  5. Epp E. J., Fee G. D. Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament textual Criticism. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1993. 430 p.
  6. Salemans B. Building Stemmas with the Computer in a Cladistic, Neo-Lachamnian Way. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press, 2000. 352 p.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru