THE TYPOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF INSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CROSS-CULTURAL SPACE
Khutyz Irina Pavlovna
Kuban State University
Abstract. In the article the importance of identifying the typologies of institutional discourse for its effective use in various sociocultural contexts is noted. By the example of academic discourse, the typology of its construction, applied in the western tradition in studying the peculiarities of creating a written discourse, is considered. The author studies each of the parameters of the typology and systematizes the differences that can be revealed in a research paper in Russian and English. It is concluded that the identification of typological characteristics of the construction of academic discourse in particular and institutional discourse in general contributes to understanding of its cross-cultural differences.
Key words and phrases: институциональный дискурс, типологические особенности, академический дискурс, коммуникативная деятельность, научная статья, целевая аудитория, institutional discourse, typological peculiarities, academic discourse, communication activity, research paper, target audience
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Andreeva I. V. Oproverzhenie v institutsional'nom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Volgograd, 2008. 200 s.
Vasil'yanova I. M. Osobennosti argumentatsii v sudebnom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Kaluga, 2007. 206 s.
Zubkova Ya. V. Konstitutivnye priznaki akademicheskogo diskursa // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2009. № 5. S. 28-32.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. M.: Gnozis, 2004. 390 s.
Kolomiets S. V. Lingvisticheskie sredstva ob"ektivatsii gendernogo displeya v institutsional'nom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Kemerovo, 2010. 170 s.
Konovalova M. V. Global'nye kategorii kogerentnosti i intertekstual'nosti v yuridicheskom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Chelyabinsk, 2008. 215 s.
Kravchenko L. M. Tipologiya verbal'nykh reaktsii nemetskoyazychnogo retsipienta na direktivnye stimuly govoryashchego v personal'nom i institutsional'nom diskursakh: diss. … k. filol. n. Volgograd, 2010. 207 s.
Mitrofanova T. A. Obrashchennost' kak pragmalingvisticheskii fenomen v institutsional'nom diskurse (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka): diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2010. 186 s.
Petrushova E. V. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie kharakteristiki diskursa predmetnoi oblasti "Marketing": diss. … k. filol. n. Krasnodar, 2011. 325 s.
Popova T. P. Nekotorye osobennosti akademicheskogo diskursa // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2015. № 7 (102). S. 85-91.
Pribylova O. V. Dinamika verbalizatsii kontsepta "terrorizm" v institutsional'nom diskurse: diss. … k. filol. n. Chelyabinsk, 2011. 193 s.
Prishchepenko M. V. Metaprofessional'nyi kontsept "usluga" v obikhodnom i institutsional'nom diskurse: na materiale angliiskogo yazyka: diss. … k. filol. n. Volgograd, 2006. 196 s.
Sadykova N. A. Taktika samoprezentatsii v personal'nom i institutsional'nom diskursakh: diss. … k. filol. n. Ufa, 2012. 182 s.
Sopova I. V. Frazeologiya i institutsional'nyi diskurs v lingvopersonologicheskom aspekte: diss. … k. filol. n. Belgorod, 2011. 252 s.
Khutyz I. P. Dialogichnost' kak sredstvo upravleniya vnimaniem adresata // Kognitivno-diskursivnoe prostranstvo v sovremennom gumanitarnom znanii: sb. nauch. tr. Krasnodar: KubGU, 2017. S. 294-302.
Khutyz I. P. Lingvokul'turnye traditsii v prostranstve akademicheskogo diskursa: osobennosti konstruirovaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2016. № 3 (23). S. 86-93.
Khutyz I. P. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya akademicheskogo diskursa: orientatsiya na chitatelya/avtora // Vestnik Maikopskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2015. Vyp. 1. S. 77-82.
Khutyz I. P. Poznanie kommunikativnykh traditsii kul'tury cherez akademicheskoe pis'mo // Osobennosti issledovaniya i konstruirovaniya aktual'nykh tipov diskursa i ikh kategorii: monografiya / pod red. I. P. Khutyz. Krasnodar: Kubanskii gos. un-t, 2016. S. 97-128.
Chernyavskaya V. E. Nauchnyi diskurs. Vydvizhenie rezul'tata kak kommunikativnaya i yazykovaya problema. M.: Lenand, 2017. 144 s.
Shpenyuk I. E. Nauchno-akademicheskii diskurs kak institutsional'nyi tip diskursa // Izvestiya Gomel'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. F. Skoriny. 2016. № 4 (97). S. 132-137.
Bowe H., Martin K. Communication across Cultures. Mutual Understanding in a Global World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 208 p.
Canagarajah S. A. A Geopolitics of Academic Writing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2002. 332 p.
Clyne M. Inter-Cultural Communication at Work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 264 p.
Hinds J. Contrastive Rhetoric: Japanese and English // Text. 1983. № 3. P. 183-196.
Hyland K. Academic Discourse. N. Y.: Continuum, 2009. 256 p.
Hyland K. Bringing in the Reader. Addressee Features in Academic Articles // Written Communication. 2001. № 18 (4). P. 549-574.
Khoutyz I. Engagement in Written Academic Discourse: a Cross-cultural Study of Russian and English Research Articles // International Journal of Russian Studies. 2015. № 4 (2). P. 135-160.
Khoutyz I. Local Linguists Mastering Academic Writing in English: Seeking Explanations in Sociocultural Contexts // Scholarly Communication and the Publish or Perish Pressures of Academia / ed. Achala Munigal. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global, 2016. P. 143-163.
Русский
