TEXT-FORMATIVE FUNCTIONS OF ANTONYMY (BY THE MATERIAL OF ENGLISH ANTONYMS)
Solov'eva Nataliya Vladimirovna
Moscow Region State University
Abstract. In the article the existing in modern science classifications of antonyms are analyzed by the type of meaning, the character of opposition, the degree of opposedness, and the use in typical antonymic contexts. On the basis of the conducted analysis the author asserts that the interest in the functioning of antonymic oppositions in speech has been steadily increasing, and considers antonyms as expressive means of the contrast making and means of preservation of cohesion and coherence of the text.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Aivaz'yants E. V. Kontrast kak smysloobrazuyushchii printsip organizatsii romanticheskogo poeticheskogo teksta: diss.. k. filol. n. Stavropol', 2014. 212 s.
Bolotnova N. S. Filologicheskii analiz teksta: uchebnoe posobie. Izd-e 4-e. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2009. 520 s.
Dymarskii M. Ya. Problemy tekstoobrazovaniya i khudozhestvennyi tekst (na materiale russkoi prozy XIX-XX vv.). Izd-e 3-e, ispr. M.: KomKniga, 2006. 296 s.
K probleme ierarkhii kategorii teksta [Elektronnyi resurs] // Biblioteka RGU imeni S. A. Esenina. URL: http://library. rsu.edu.ru/archives/7340 (data obrashcheniya: 06.01.2015).
Kumanyaeva A. E. Izuchenie tekstoobrazuyushchei funktsii leksicheskikh sredstv kak put' sovershenstvovaniya rechi uchashchikhsya: avtoref. diss.. k. ped. n. M., 2006. 32 s.
Novikov L. A. Russkaya antonimiya i ee leksikograficheskoe opisanie // Slovar' antonimov russkogo yazyka. M.: Rus. yaz., 1984. S. 5-30.
Novikova Yu. O. Rechevaya antonimiya kak otrazhenie obydennoi kartiny mira (na materiale amerikanskogo varianta angliiskogo yazyka): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. SPb., 2010. 25 s.
Sadchenko V. T. Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskoi semiotiki // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 5. S. 104-111.
Tayupova O. I., Zhabbarova F. U. Kategorii teksta kak lingvisticheskie universalii // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 20. S. 98-100.
Shekspir U. Son v letnyuyu noch' [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://lib.ru/SHAKESPEARE/shks_midsummer4.txt_ with-big-pictures.html#15 (data obrashcheniya: 16.01.2015).
Shinkarenko Yu. V. Priem kontrasta i sistema raznourovnevykh yazykovykh sredstv ego vyrazheniya v poemakh A. S. Pushkina: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. M., 2006. 27 s.
Gao Ch. A Linguistic Study of Antonymy in English Texts // Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Helsinki: Academy Publisher, 2014. Vol. 5. № 1. R. 234-238.
Jones S. Antonymy: a Corpus-Based Perspective. London: Routledge, 2002. 193 p.
Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. 256 p.
Murphy L. M. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 292 p.
Panther K.-U., Thornburg L. L. Antonymy in Language Structure and Use [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.lexicom.es/ drupal/files/AntonymyInLGStructUse.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 06.01.2015).
Dickens Ch. A Tale of Two Cities [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/98/98-h/98-h.htm (data obrashcheniya: 08.01.2015)