GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 12. Part 4. P. 50-55.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ANTHROPOCENTRIC ESSENCE OF A COMMUNICATIVE DIVISION OF A SENTENCE
Vinogradova Svetlana Grigor'evna
Tambov State University named after G. R. Derzhavin
Abstract. Within the context of the traditional trends to investigate this phenomenon - logical, psychological and structural-functional - the communicative division of a sentence manifests itself as an anthropocentrically conditioned phenomenon. Its anthropocentric essence in the context of simple and composite sentences acquires a serious argumentativeness within the framework of the theories of the most promising nowadays cognitive trend in linguistics. Studying the communicative division of a sentence taking into account the recently identified interpreting function of a language which represents the individuality of cognitive processes mediated by the language allows, as the author believes, discovering the new dimensions of this phenomenon in the cognitive and anthropocentric aspect.
Key words and phrases: антропоцентрический, коммуникативное членение предложения, простое предложение, сложное предложение, направление исследования, логический, психологический, структурно-функциональный, когнитивный, интерпретация, anthropocentric, communicative division of a sentence, simple sentence, composite sentence, trend of the research, logical, psychological, structural-functional, cognitive, interpretation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Aristotel'. Sochineniya: v 4-kh t. / Akademiya nauk SSR, Institut filosofii. M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi literatury "Mysl'", 1978. T. 2. 688 s.
  2. Boldyrev N. N. Aktual'nye zadachi kognitivnoi lingvistiki na sovremennom etape // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2013. № 1. S. 5-13.
  3. Boldyrev N. N. Antropotsentricheskaya sushchnost' yazyka v funktsiyakh, edinitsakh i kategoriyakh // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2015. № 1. S. 5-12.
  4. Boldyrev N. N. Interpretiruyushchaya funktsiya yazyka // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. № 33 (248). Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. Vyp. 60. S. 11-16.
  5. Boldyrev N. N. Kontseptual'naya osnova yazyka // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka: kollekt. monografiya. M. - Tambov: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN; Izdatel'skii dom TGU im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2009. Vyp. IV. Kontseptualizatsiya mira v yazyke. S. 25-77.
  6. Vinogradova S. G. Interpretiruyushchii kharakter kommunikativnogo chleneniya slozhnogo predlozheniya (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) // Istoricheskaya i sotsial'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl'. 2014. T. 6. № 6 (28). Ch. 2. S. 55-59.
  7. Vinogradova S. G. Slozhnoe predlozhenie kak format yazykovogo znaniya: interpretatsionnyi aspekt // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2014. № 3 (40). S. 10-18.
  8. Gurevich V. V. Aktual'noe chlenenie predlozheniya v ego raznykh proyavleniyakh // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2004. № 3. S. 69-87.
  9. Kolshanskii G. V. Kommunikativnaya funktsiya i struktura yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1984. 173 s.
  10. Kolshanskii G. V. Logika i struktura yazyka. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1965. 240 s.
  11. Kubryakova E. S. Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov. M.: Filol. f-t MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova, 1996. 248 s.
  12. Matezius V. O tak nazyvaemom aktual'nom chlenenii predlozheniya // Prazhskii lingvisticheskii kruzhok: sbornik statei. M.: Progress, 1967. S. 239-245.
  13. Paul' G. Printsipy istorii yazyka / per. s nem.; pod red. A. A. Kholodovicha. M.: Izd-vo in. lit-ry, 1960. 500 s.
  14. Slyusareva N. A. Problemy funktsional'nogo sintaksisa sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka: monografiya. M.: Nauka, 1981. 206 s.
  15. Stepanov Yu. S. Metody i printsipy sovremennoi lingvistiki. M.: Nauka, 1975. 313 s.
  16. Stroson P. F. Identifitsiruyushchaya referentsiya i istinnostnoe znachenie // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Raduga, 1982. Vyp. XIII. Logika i lingvistika (problemy referentsii). S. 109-133.
  17. Talmi L. Fenomeny vnimaniya // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2006. № 2. S. 23-44.
  18. Cheif U. Dannoe, kontrastivnost', opredelennost', podlezhashchee, topiki i tochka zreniya // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Vyp. XI. Sovremennye sintaksicheskie teorii v amerikanskoi lingvistike. M.: Progress, 1982. S. 277-316.
  19. Boost K. Neue Untersuchunger zum Wesen und zur Struktur des deutschen Satzes. Berlin, 1955. 88 S.
  20. British National Corpus [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://corpus.byu.edu__gt__bnc (data obrashcheniya: 06.10.2015).
  21. Chafe W. L. Language and Consciousness // Language. 1974. Vol. 50. P. 111-133.
  22. Chomsky N. Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Representation // Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. P. 193-217.
  23. Clark H. H., Haviland S. E. Comprehension and the Given-New Contract // Discourse Production and Comprehension. Vol. 1: Discourse Processes: Advances in Research and Theory / ed. by R. O. Freedle. Norwood: Ablex Publ., 1977. P. 1-40.
  24. Corpus of Contemporary American English [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://corpus.byu.edu__gt__coca (data obrashcheniya: 06.10.2015).
  25. Gabelentz G. von. Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax. Wort und Satzstellung // Zeitschrift f?r V?lkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft. 1869. Bd. 6. S. 376-384.
  26. Gardiner A. The Theory of Speech and Language. Oxford, 1951. 332 p.
  27. Halliday M. A. K. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2 // Journal of Linguistics. 1967. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 199-244.
  28. Halliday M. A. K. Options and Functions in the English Clause // Brno Studies in English. 1969. Vol. 8. № 137. P. 81-88.
  29. Hilgard E. R., Atkinson R. C. Introduction to Psychology. N. Y. - Chicago: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1967. 686 p.
  30. Hirst D. and A. Di Cristo. Intonation Systems. A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 220 p.
  31. Krech D., Crutchfield R., Livson N. Elements of Psychology. N. Y., 1969. P. 219-229.
  32. Lambrecht K. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. P. 1-333.
  33. Osgood C. E. Lectures on Language Performance. N. Y.: Springer Verlag, 1980. 276 p.
  34. Prince E. F. On the Inferencing of Inde?nite-this NPs // Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. P. 231-250.
  35. Stockwell R. P. Foundations of Syntactic Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1977. 217 p.
  36. Tompson S. A. "Subordination" and Narrative Event Structure // Typological Studies in Language 11: Coherence and Grounding in Discourse / ed. by R. S. Tomlin. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1987. P. 435-454.
  37. W?rvik B. What is Foregrounded in Narratives? Hypotheses for Cognitive Basis of Foregrounding // Approaches to Cognition through Text and Discourse. Berlin - N. Y.: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. P. 99-122.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru