THE INTERPRETATION OF SYNTACTICALLY AMBIGUOUS CONSTRUCTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE: AN ADJUNCT AT A COMPLEX NOUN PHRASE
Chernova Dar'ya Alekseevna
Saint-Petersburg
Abstract. The article examines the problem of ambiguity while a syntactic analysis in the process of speech perception. Syntactically ambiguous constructions with an adjunct at a complex noun phrase, holding an interest from the point of view of translingual comparisons, are considered. The results of the experimental study by the material of the Russian language are presented: the role of a number of factors, conditioning the choice of this or that interpretation of syntactically ambiguous construction is demonstrated.
Key words and phrases: синтаксическая неоднозначность, синтаксическая обработка, адъюнкт при сложной именной группе, причастный оборот, предложная группа, syntactic ambiguity, syntactic processing, adjunct at a complex noun phrase, participial construction, prepositional phrase
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Gladkii A. V. Sintaksicheskie struktury estestvennogo yazyka v avtomatizirovannykh sistemakh obshcheniya. M.: Nauka, 1985. 144 s.
Dragoi O. V. Razreshenie sintaksicheskoi neodnoznachnosti: pravila i veroyatnosti // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2006. № 6. S. 44-61.
Peshkovskii A. M. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2001. 544 s.
Rusakova M. V. Elementy antropotsentricheskoi grammatiki russkogo yazyka. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2013. 568 s.
Fedorova O. V., Yanovich I. S. Ob odnom tipe sintaksicheskoi mnogoznachnosti, ili Kto stoyal na balkone // Sbornik trudov Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii "Dialog". M., 2004. C. 644-649.
Bock J. K., Warren R. K. Conceptual Accessibility and Syntactic Structure in Sentence Formulation // Cognition. 1985. Vol. 21. R. 47-67.
Croft W. Typology and Universals. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 2003. 341 p.
Cuetos F. & Mitchell D. C. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Parsing: Restrictions on the Use of the Late Closure Strategy in Spanish // Cognition. 1988. 30. R. 73-105.
Desmet T., Brysbaert M. & De Baecke C. The Correspondence between Sentence Production and Corpus Frequencies in Modifier Attachment // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2002. Vol. 55A (3). R. 879-896.
Fodor J. D. Prosodic Disambiguation in Silent Reading // Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst: GSLA, University of Massachusetts. 2002. Vol. 32. R. 113-132.
Frazier L. & Fodor J. D. The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model // Cognition. 1978. Vol. 6. R. 291-325.
Gibson E., Sch?tze C. & Salomon A. The Relationship between the Frequency and the Complexity of Linguistic Structure // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1996. Vol. 25. R. 59-92.
Hemforth B., Konieczny L. and Scheepers C. Principle-Based and Probabilistic Approaches to Human Parsing: How Universal Is The Human Language Processor? / Trost H. (Ed.) Tagungsband KONVENS, 1994. R. 161-170.
Sekerina I. The Late Closure Principle in Processing of Ambiguous Russian Sentences // The Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Germany: Universit?t Potsdam, 2003. R. 205-217.
Русский
