ON TYPOLOGY OF ADNOMINAL POSSESSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS BY THE MATERIAL OF VASYUGAN KHANTY
Potanina Olga Sergeevna
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Abstract. The article considers canonical adnominal possessive constructions in the Vasyugan dialect of Khanty. The canonical adnominal constructions are the ones with the overtly marked syntactic relation between the possessor and the possessum which compose a single noun phrase. Non-canonical possessive constructions are usually refered to external possession constructions. The research focuses on adnominal possessive constructions which are head-marked. The author conducts the preliminary comparative analysis of morphologically marked and unmarked (juxtaposed) adnominal possessive constructions in the Vasyugan Khanty. The analysis is based on the constructions with the meaning of possession proper and the ones with non-possessive meanings in an attempt to explain the specificity of their distribution.
Key words and phrases: документация исчезающих языков, васюганский диалект хантыйского языка, категория посессивности, атрибутивные посессивные конструкции, documentation of endangered languages, the Vasyugan Khanty, category of possessivity, adnominal possessive constructions
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Mindiyarova E. R. Morfologo-sintaksicheskii sposob vyrazheniya kategorii prityazhatel'nosti v khantyiskom i tatarskom yazykakh // Vestn. Tomskogo gos. ped. un-ta. 2007. № 4 (67). S. 86-88.
Mindiyarova E. R. Sistema posessivnykh affiksov v vasyuganskom dialekte khantyiskogo yazyka na materiale polevykh zapisei 2008 g. // Vestn. Tomskogo gos. un-ta. 2009. № 323. S. 35-37.
Plungyan V. A. Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira. M.: RGGU, 2011. 672 c.
Filchenko A. Possessive Constructions in Eastern Khanty // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2014. № 1 (3). P. 99-112.
Filchenko A., Potanina O. Khanty Texts // Annotated Folklore Prose Texts of Ob-Yenissey Language Area. Tomsk: Vajar, 2010. Vol. 1. P. 39-132.
Heine B. ?Possession: ?Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, 1997. 292 p.
Honti L. ’HABERE’ "po-ural'ski" // Linguistica Uralica XLIV. 2008. № 3. S. 161-177.
Nichols J., Bickel B. Chapter Locus of Marking in Possessive Noun Phrases [Elektronnyi resurs] / D. S. Matthew & M. Haspelmath (eds.) // The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 2011. URL: http://wals.info/chapter/24 (data obrashcheniya: 05.02.2014).
Nikolaeva I. Possession vs. Nominal Attribution in Uralic / E. Helimski and A. Widmer (eds.) // W??a w??a - Sei gegr?sst! Beitr?ge zur Finnougristik zu Ehren von Gert Sauer dargebracht zu seinem siebzigsten Geburtstag. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2002. S. 239-250.
Potanina O. Manifestations of Language Attrition Among Eastern Khanty Speakers // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2013. № 2 (2). P. 75-82.
Siewierska A. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 327 p.
Русский
