ROLE OF ONOMATOPOETIC WORDS IN FORMATION OF CONCRETE RELATION IN TATAR LANGUAGE
Sagdieva Ramilya Kamilovna
Kazan Federal University
Abstract. For many years the onomatopoetic word has been regarded as modal part of speech in the Tatar language. From the late XX th century it was included in the structure of content words. In the present article the concrete relation between onomatopoetic words and verbs is studied for the first time ever, as well as the concrete relation between nouns; shades of meaning and means of expression are being analyzed.
Key words and phrases: конкретизирующее отношение, звукоподражательные слова, глагол, имя существительное, способы выражения между словами, concrete relation, onomatopoetic words, verb, noun, means of expression between words
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Gyil??ev A. M. ?s?rl?r, d?rt tomda. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1994. T. 4. Roman. Povest'. 440 b.
Eniki ?. N. ?iz ky?gyrau: khik?yal?r. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1995. 224 b.
Zakiev M. Z. Sintaksicheskii stroi tatarskogo yazyka. Kazan': Izd-vo KGU, 1963. 464 s.
Ibra?imov G. Sailanma khezm?tl?r. Kazan: "Kh?ter" n?shr., 2002. 543 b.
Kashapov M. Kh. Tatar tele sintaksisynnan lektsiyal?r. Kazan: Gumanitarya, 2003. 168 b.
Peshkovskii A. M. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii. M.: Gos. uchebno-ped. izd-vo Min-va prosv. RSFSR, 1956. 512 s.
Sagdieva R. K. Affiksy kak sredstva vyrazheniya konkretiziruyushchikh otnoshenii v tatarskom yazyke: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. Kazan', 2000. 22 s.
S?g'dieva R. K. G. Ibra?imov ?s?rl?rend? s?zl?rne kabatlau charasy // G. Ibra?imov ??m XXI gasyr: Tuuyna 120 el tuluga bagyshlangan khalykara f?nni-gam?li konferentsiya materiallary. Kazan, 2007. B. 209-212.
S?g'dieva R. K. S?zl?rne b?il??che charalar (kushymchalar): metodik kullanma. Kazan: Gumanitarya, 2002. 100 b.
Tatarskaya grammatika. Kazan': Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, 1997. T. II. Morfologiya. 397 s.
Tatar grammatikasy. M. – Kazan: INSAN; FIKER. 1999. T. III. 512 b.
Tumasheva D. G. Kh?zerge tatar ?d?bi tele morfologiyase. Kazan: KDU n?shr., 1964. 300 b.
Uchevatkin A. A. Mezhdometie kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskikh issledovanii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2011. № 1. S. 157-159.
Kharisova Ch. M. Tatar tele. Morfologiya: Yugary uku iortlary ?chen d?reslek. Kazan: M?garif, 2010. 128 b.
Kharisova Ch. M. Tatar telend? s?z t?rkemn?re m?s'?l?se // Yazykovaya situatsiya v Respublike Tatarstan: sostoyanie i perspektivy: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (17 noyabrya 1998 goda): v 2 chastyakh. Kazan': Izdatel'stvo "Master Lain", 1999. Ch. II. S. 114-115.
Khisamova F. M. Tatar tele morfologiyase: Yugary uku iortlary ?chen d?reslek. Kazan: M?garif, 2006. 335 b.
Shirobokova S. N. Mezhdometiya kak chast' rechi, ikh funktsionirovanie v udmurtskom yazyke // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 10. S. 201-204.
Русский
