Zinnatullina Gul'shat Khabirovna
Kazan State Technical University named after A. N. Tupolev
Abstract. In the article the anthroponyms used in the works of the Tatar literature classical writers are considered. First the anthroponym system of fiction texts is shown as an onomastic field with the nucleus, perinuclear space and periphery. The features of functioning and the peculiarities of each stratum are analyzed. It is revealed that periphery elements being an important artistic-poetic component of the works participate in the creation of stylistic figures and poetic methods.
Key words and phrases: ономастическое пространство, ономастическое поле, антропонимы, художественный текст, функции, onomastic space, onomastic field, anthroponyms, fiction text, functions
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Alekseeva E. A. Imya sobstvennoe v aspekte otozhdestvleniya (na materiale frantsuzskogo yazyka) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 12. Ch. 1. S. 29-34.
Brueva E. M. Funktsii lichnykh imen v sovetskoi basne // Onomastika Povolzh'ya. Gor'kii, 1971. S 327-331.
Eniki ?. ?s?rl?r. Kazan, 2000. T. 1. 447 b.
Eniki ?. ?s?rl?r. Kazan, 2003. T. 4. 479 b.
Lukoshkova O. I. Sistema imenovanii personazhei v russkoi narodnoi i literaturnoi skazkakh pervoi poloviny XIX veka: diss. … k. filol. n. Tyumen', 2000. 156 s.
Nikitina N. V. Onomasticheskoe prostranstvo poezii A. T. Tvardovskogo: diss. … k. filol. n. Smolensk, 2006. 226 s.
Suprun V. I. Onomasticheskoe pole russkogo yazyka i ego khudozhestvenno-esteticheskii potentsial. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000. 171 s.
Kh?sni F. Sailanma ?s?rl?r. Kazan: TaRIKh, 2002. 447 b.
?mir M. M. Bezne? avyl keshese: povest'lar. Kazan, 2007. 511 b.