GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 11. Part 2. P. 163-165.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ROLE OF POSTPOSITION ?ЧЕН (BEHIND) AND POSTPOSITIONAL WORD ДИП (SPEAKING) IN THE FORMATION OF CONCRETIZING RELATION IN THE TATAR LANGUAGE

Sagdieva Ramilya Kamilovna
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University


Abstract. Morphology and syntax are closely related because they are elements of grammar. Nowadays morphological units in syntax are examined in the functional aspect. Studying connectors is also a step to "functional grammar". Philologists describe them in a generalized form. The paper for the first time investigates the postposition ?чен (behind) and postpositional word дип (speaking) as connectors concretizing relations between the words in the Tatar language. The researcher identifies their meanings and shades of meaning.
Key words and phrases: конкретизирующее отношение, послелог, послеложное слово, глагол, имя существительное, наречие, прилагательное, средства связи, concretizing relation, postposition, postpositional word, verb, noun, adverb, adjective, connectors
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Galiev Sh. G. Il?amym-m?kh?bb?tem: lirik yazmalar. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1986. 408 b.
  2. Galiullin T. N. D?g'va: khik?yal?r, publitsistika, ?d?bi t?nkyit'. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1995. 256 b.
  3. Gyil??ev A. M. ?s?rl?r, d?rt tomda. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1994. T. 4. Roman. Povest'. 440 b.
  4. Eniki ?. N. ?iz ky?gyrau: khik?yal?r. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1995. 224 b.
  5. Eniki ?. N. Kichke sh?f?k': Povest'lar. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1989. 384 b.
  6. Kirillova Z. N. Problema opredeleniya podchinitel'nykh soyuzov i soyuznykh slov v tatarskom yazyke // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2008. № 2. S. 54-55.
  7. M??diev M. Sailanma ?s?rl?r: 3 tomda. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1994. T. 1. Povest'lar. 534 b.
  8. Nabiullina G. A. Sintaksis slozhnogo predlozheniya v tatarskikh poslovitsakh (po trekhtomnomu sborniku N. Isanbeta "Tatar khalyk m?kal'l?re"): diss.. k. filol. n. Kazan', 2002. 262 s.
  9. Sagdieva R. K. Affiksy kak sredstva vyrazheniya konkretiziruyushchikh otnoshenii v tatarskom yazyke: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. Kazan', 2000. 22 s.
  10. Sagdieva R. K. Rol' zvukopodrazhatel'nykh slov v obrazovanii konkretiziruyushchego otnosheniya v tatarskom yazyke // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 3 (33). Ch. 2. S. 169-172.
  11. Tatarskaya grammatika. Kazan': Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, 1997. T. II. Morfologiya. 397 s.
  12. Kharisova Ch. M. Tatar tele. Morfologiya: Yugary uku iortlary ?chen d?reslek. Kazan: M?garif, 2010. 128 b.
  13. Kh?s?nov M. Kh. Saf ?ill?r: roman. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1986. 423 b.
  14. ?ps?l?mov G. Ak ch?ch?kl?r: roman. Kazan: Tatar. kit. n?shr., 1989. 510 b.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru