SENTENCE ACTUAL DIVISION PHENOMENON GENESIS AND FORMATION: THE PRAGUE LINGUISTIC CIRCLE
Ogienko Ekaterina Aleksandrovna
Donets Basins State Pedagogical University, Ukraine
Abstract. The author considers the problem of sentence actual division (SAD) phenomenon in linguo-historiographic aspect, traces SAD formation within the limits of the Prague Linguistic Circle, taking into account actualism method and five modern approaches to SAD phenomenon qualification, in addition considers this school followers’ conceptions, and comes to the conclusion that these works contain the key positions of SAD theory and are the basis for practically all the researches in the sphere of functional syntax.
Key words and phrases: актуальное членение предложения, основа, ядро, тема, рема, переход, фокус, коммуникативный динамизм (КД), степень КД, актуально-синтаксический тип, контекст, sentence actual division, basis, core, theme, rheme, transition, focus, communicative dynamism (C
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Adamets P. Poryadok slov v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Prague: Academia, 1966. 96 s.
2. Gaichova E., Sgall P. Aktual'noe chlenenie yazyka i ego mesto v opisanii yazyka // Formal'noe opisanie struktury estestvennogo yazyka: sb. nauch. trudov / pod red. A. S. Narin'yani. Novosibirsk, 1980. № 10. S. 39-60.
3. Danesh F., Gauzenblas K. Problematika urovnei s tochki zreniya struktury vyskazyvaniya i sistemy yazykovykh sredstv // Edinitsy raznykh urovnei grammaticheskogo stroya yazyka i ikh vzaimodeistvie: doklady simpoziuma
18–22 aprelya 1967 g. / pod red. V. N. Yartsevoi i N. Yu. Shvedovoi. M.: Nauka, 1969. S. 7-20.
4. Il'enko S. G. Rusistika: izbrannye trudy. SPb.: Izd-vo RPGU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2003. 674 s.
5. Lapteva O. A. Chekhoslovatskie raboty poslednikh let po voprosam aktual'nogo chleneniya predlozheniya // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1963. № 4. S. 120-127.
6. Matezius V. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu / per. s chesh. i angl. G. V. Matveevoi. M.: Editorial URSS, 2003. 228 s.
7. Pala K. O nekotorykh problemakh aktual'nogo chleneniya // Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics. 1966. № 1. P. 81-92.
8. Podkorytov G. A. O prirode nauchnogo metoda. L.: Izd-vo Leningrad. un-ta, 1988. 224 s.
9. Selіvanova O. O. Suchasna lіngvіstika: termіnologіchna entsiklopedіya. Poltava: Dovkіllya-K, 2006. 716 s.
10. Firbas Ya. Funktsii voprosa v protsesse kommunikatsii // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1972. № 2. S. 55-65.
11. Bene? E. On Two Aspects of Functional Sentence Perspective // Travaux linguistiques de Prague. Prague: Academia. 1968. V. 3. P. 267-274.
12. Dane? F. A Three-Level Approach to Syntax // Travaux linguistiques de Prague. Prague: Academia. 1964. № 1. P. 221-242.
13. Dokulil M., Dane? F. K tak zvan?m v?znamov? a mluvnick? stavb? v?ty // O v?deck?m pozn?n? soudob?ch jazyku. Praha: Academia, 1958. P. 231-246.
14. Filipec J. Zur Frage der funktionalen Satzperspektive im dramatischen Text // Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective / ed. by F. Dane?. Prague: Academia, 1974. P. 129-141.
15. Mathesius V. A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis. Prague: Academia, 1975. 228 p.
16. Sgall P. Functional Sentence Perspective in the Generative Description // Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics. 1967. № 2. P. 203-225.
17. Uhli?ov? L. On the Role of Statistics in the Investigation of FSP // Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective / ed. by F. Dane?. Prague: Academia, 1974. P. 208-216.