LIBERTY AND OVER-LITERAL RENDERING OF POETIC TRANSLATION: DICHOTOMY OR ANTINOMY?
Leont'eva Kseniya Ivanovna
Smolensk Classical University
Abstract. The status and purposes of word for word and loose translations in translation language culture are different due to the polar vector orientation to form/content and one of the cultures. The author analyzes different points of view concerning their correlation. At the same time word for word and loose translations are not mutually exclusive dichotomies but dialectic antinomies. Besides loose translation as well as over-literal rendering absolutizes one of the aspects of the original (pragmatic component) and can be considered as a pragmatic type of over-literal rendering.
Key words and phrases: поэтический перевод, вольный перевод, буквальный перевод, формализм, сенсуализм, стратегия и метод перевода, poetic translation, loose translation, word for word translation, formalism, sensualism, translation strategy and method
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Averintsev S. S. Razmyshleniya nad perevodami Zhukovskogo // Averintsev C. C. Poety. M.: Shkola "Yazyki russkoi kul'tury", 1996. S. 137-164.
Ben'yamin V. Zadacha perevodchika: predislovie k perevodu "Parizhskikh kartin" Bodlera // Derrida Zh. Vokrug vavilonskikh bashen. SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002. S. 87-111.
Galeeva N. L. Dikhotomii v perevodcheskoi deyatel'nosti // Kosmopolis. M.: MGIMO, 2006. № 1 (15). S. 127-133.
Gasparov M. L. Bryusov i bukvalizm // Poetika perevoda. M.: Raduga, 1988. S. 29-62.
Goncharenko S. F. Poeticheskii perevod i perevod poezii: konstanty i variativnost' // Tetradi perevodchika. M.: MGLU, 1999. Vyp. 24. S. 108-111.
Klyukanov I. E. Dinamika mezhkul'turnogo obshcheniya: sistemno-semioticheskoe issledovanie. Tver', 1998. 99 s.
Levik V. V. O tochnosti i vernosti // Masterstvo perevoda: sbornik statei. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1959. Vyp. 1. S. 254-275.
Mkrtchyan M. L. Poeziya v perevode // Masterstvo perevoda: sbornik statei. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1970. Vyp. 6. S. 5-46.
Nabokov V. V. Kommentarii k romanu A. S. Pushkina "Evgenii Onegin". SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 1998. 928 s.
Nesterova N. M. Vtorichnost' kak ontologicheskoe svoistvo perevoda: diss. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Perm', 2005. 368 c.
Sorokin Yu. A. Perevodovedenie: status perevodchika i psikhogermenevticheskie protsedury. M.: Gnozis, 2003. 160 s.
Toper P. M. Perevod v sisteme sravnitel'nogo literaturovedeniya. M.: Nasledie, 2000. 254 s.
Chukovskii K. I. Vysokoe iskusstvo. M.: Azbuka-klassika; Avalon", 2008. 448 s.
Etkind E. G. O poeticheskoi vernosti // Masterstvo perevoda: cbornik statei. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1963. Vyp. 2. S. 97-150.
House J. Translation Quality Assessment: a Model Revisited. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1997. 222 p.
Lefevere A., Bassnett S. Where Are We in Translation Studies? // Constructing Cultures: essays on literary translation / ed. by S. Bassnett & A. Lefevere. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 1998. P. 1-24.
Liebs E. A Philosophy of Translating as a Literary Subject // Translation of Poetry and Poetic Prose: proceedings of Nobel symposium 110 / ed. by Sture Allen. New York - London: World Scientific, 1999. P. 15-30.
Русский
