SOME ISSUES OF CRIMES INVESTIGATION IN THE FORM OF DIFFERENTIAL (SHORT-CUT) INQUIRY
Roditeleva Yana Nikolaevna
Krasnodar University of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia (Branch) in Crimea, Simferopol
Abstract. The article discusses the desirability of changing the criminal procedural legislation and criminal procedural policy of the Russian Federation that is expressed in the introduction of a new form of preliminary investigation, which is characterized by contracted procedural terms, the specificity of the process of proving, the expansion of the procedural rights of the sides and the simultaneous limitation of the procedural independence of the investigator, into criminal trial by the legislator. It is concluded that there was a merger of inquiry and preliminary check on report about crime that makes it possible to assume the penetration of insufficiently qualitative evidential matter into judicature.
Key words and phrases: уголовно-процессуальное законодательство, сокращенная форма дознания, доказательства, судебное производство, дознаватель, следственные и процессуальные действия, criminal procedural legislation, short-cut inquiry, evidence, judicature, investigator, investigative and procedural proceedings
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Ashirbekova M. T. O kriteriyakh differentsiatsii form doznaniya // Doznanie v sokrashchennoi forme: voprosy zakonodatel'noi reglamentatsii i problemy pravoprimeneniya: sb. st. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2013. S. 7-15.
Gir'ko S. I. Proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu doznaniya v sokrashchennoi forme: prognozy i suzhdeniya // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2013. № 21. S. 2-5.
Dolya E. A. Osobennosti dokazyvaniya pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokrashchennoi forme // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2013. № 6. S. 43-45.
Doroshkov V. V. Osobyi poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred"yavlennym emu obvineniem // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2004. № 9. S. 32-36.
Michurina O. V. Kontseptsiya doznaniya v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii i problemy ee realizatsii v organakh vnutrennikh del: avtoref. diss.. d.yu.n. M., 2008. 60 s.
O vnesenii izmenenii v st. 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks RF: Federal'nyi zakon ot 04 marta 2013 g. № 23-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2013. № 9. St. 875.
O sudebnoi ekspertize po ugolovnym delam [Elektronnyi resurs]: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Poluyaktova N. Sokrashchennomu doznaniyu byt'? // EZh-Yurist. 2012. № 31. S. 18-19.
Ryabinina T. K. Doznanie - samostoyatel'naya forma dosudebnogo proizvodstva // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2013. № 19. S. 44-48.
Sementsov V. A. Sokrashchennaya forma rassledovaniya // Sovershenstvovanie deyatel'nosti pravookhranitel'nykh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu v sovremennykh usloviyakh: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Tyumen', 2012. Vyp. 9. S. 378-379.
Sumin A. A. Sokrashchennoe doznanie: mertvorozhdennoe ditya reformatorov ugolovnogo protsessa // Advokat. 2013. № 10. S. 5-9.
Teiman S. Sdelki o priznanii viny ili sokrashchenie formy sudoproizvodstva: po kakomu puti poidet Rossiya? // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 1998. № 11. S. 36-37.
Ugolovnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Ukrainy (ot 13 aprelya 2012 g. № 4651-VI) [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://base.spinform.ru/show_doc.fwx?rgn=52250 (data obrashcheniya: 24.12.2014).
Shipitsina V. V., Chukhlib A. V. Doznanie v sokrashchennoi forme // Aktual'nye problemy sudebnoi vlasti, prokurorskogo nadzora, pravookhranitel'noi i pravozashchitnoi deyatel'nosti, ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: sb. nauch. st. / pod obshch. i nauch. red. O. V. Gladyshevoi, V. A. Sementsova. Krasnodar: Prosveshchenie-Yug, 2014. S. 244-249.
Yakubina Yu. P. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya form predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: avtoref. diss. … k.yu.n. Khabarovsk, 2010.
Русский
